Connolly Albizu by vagabond ©

Don Pedro Albizu Campos And James Connolly: Brothers In Arms

Connolly Albizu by vagabond ©
Connolly Albizu by vagabond ©

“And I would like the delegates of Puerto Rico to convey my greetings, and those of all Cuba, to Pedro Albizu Campos. We would like you to convey to Pedro Albizu Campos our deep-felt respect, our recognition of the example he has shown with his valor, and our fraternal feelings as free men toward a man who is free, despite being in the dungeons of the so-called U.S. democracy.”
– Ché Guevara – Latin American Youth Congress, Havana, Cuba, July 28, 1960

If you strike at, imprison, or kill us, out of our prisons or graves we will still evoke a spirit that will thwart you, and perhaps, raise a force that will destroy you! We defy you! Do your worst!
James Connolly

Pedro Albizu Campos was a legendary revolutionary figure who influenced some of the greatest and well know revolutionary figures and movements of the twentieth century like Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers, the Young Lords and the Weathermen. However very little is know about Albizu. In order to understand the influence Albizu had we need to understand what his philosophy was and how he came into those beliefs.

Albizu was born on September 12th of 1893, on the Caribbean coast of Puerto Rico in the city of Ponce. It was the end of the 18th century and a 400 year chapter in Puerto Rican history was coming to a close. In 1897 Albizu would have been four years old, and Puerto Rico was in the process of negotiating its complete autonomy from 400 years of Spanish colonial rule. A year later in 1898 the Spanish-American War broke out and the US began it’s invasion of Spanish forces in Puerto Rico. The initial US invasion was only a few miles from where Albizu was born in a town called Guanica. The invasion quickly ended Spanish colonial rule on the island nation… and almost quickly as Spanish colonialism came to an end it became the beginning of US colonial rule. This was the historical stage that Albizu was born into and the role he would go on to play would forever change the history of Puerto Rico, the US and the world.

Albizu was a gifted student and while he was in high school he was offered a scholarship to the University Of Vermont. He accepted and studied Engineering with an emphasis in Chemistry. Shortly after that he transferred to Harvard University. In 1914 he volunteered for the Army Reserve and was sent back to Puerto Rico as a second lieutenant to organize troops in Ponce. He was called back to the Army Reserve and assigned a post in the all Black 375th infantry, to serve in WWI. The racism he experienced in the 375th as an Afro-Puerto Rican made an indelible mark on Albizu. It was his experienced with racism in the 375th that led him to an understanding that began to percolate in his mind. Puerto Rico was a colony of the US and Puerto Rico needed to be free from US colonial rule.

Albizu In Blue by vagabond ©
Albizu In Blue by vagabond ©

In 1919 he returned to Harvard to study Law. He became the president of the Cosmopolitan Club at Harvard. It was through the club that he was introduced to the burgeoning independence movement in India through the guest lectures of Subha Chandras Bose who advocated for India’s independence through any and all means including the use of violence. Subha Chandras Bose was the counter balance to Gandhi’s non-violent approach towards gaining the independence of India from the British.

Albizu also met with the Indian poet Rabindranath Tagore who was a follower of Gandhi’s passive resistance who was on a tour giving speeches in support of independence for India. Albizu was chosen to debate Tagore at Harvard on his ideas of nationalism. Tagore believed in nationalism in cultural terms but feared that nationalism in political terms would eventually lead to a corruption in the form of a constant desire for power. Tagore’s views were based on the ideals of romantic idealism and the idea that there was an inherent love that existed within all things that could be used to tame nationalism’s desire for power. Albizu disagreed with this view and felt Tagore ideas on nationalism were much to esoteric for him. Albizu’s ideas on nationalism and the way to achieve it, were much more in line with the Irish Republican struggle.

Albizu was introduced to the struggle for Irish Republicanism through two Catholic priests. Father Rodes introduced him to the Catalan Philosopher Priest Jaime Balmes who believed that where Catholicism brought order to Europe, Protestantism was rebellious and brought revolt to Europe. Another Priest Father Ryan introduced Albizu to scholasticism which is a means of critical thought that placed a strong emphasis on dialectic thinking. Father Ryan brought all these ideas together in a tangible way that could be used as a means of nation building in the example of James Connolly.

James Connolly (Dublin)
James Connolly (Dublin)

Connolly devoted his life to the cause of Irish Independence. He was a devoted labor organizer and an internationalist. He was a working class intellectual man of action who founded the Irish Socialist Party and was an instrumental voice in the Internationalist Workers of the World labour union here in the US. He had a clear sense of class consciousness which came from his poverty-stricken upbringing and his study of Marxist thought. It was Connolly’s class consciousness that forced the Irish Volunteers, who he felt had no analysis of class to join Connolly’s own Irish Civilian Army in taking the fight to the British. That alliance along with the Irish Republican Brotherhood brought about the famous Easter Rising of 1916 that set Ireland on a course for home rule. Connolly was badly injured in the Easter Rising and when the British finally defeated the Irish, Connolly and many of the other Irish Republicans were executed. Eamon de Valera the Irish Republican who would eventually broker a deal for Home Rule in Ireland and fought alongside Connolly was spared and sent to prison.

De Valera escaped prison and came to the US to garner support for the Irish cause. Albizu had founded clubs in Boston in support of Irish independence. When De Valera came to Boston he was greeted by Albizu. In 1921 independence came to Southern Ireland and Albizu was asked by De Valera to consult on the Free Irish State Constitution. Although Albizu knew De Valera, Albizu’s thinking was more in line with James Connolly who saw the Home Rule that De Valera brokered with the splitting of Northern Ireland from the rest of Ireland as unsatisfactory to say the least.

It was Albizu’s reading of Jaime Balmes and his experience with how the Irish used their Catholicism to distinguish themselves in their struggle for freedom that drew Albizu to Catholicism. The US was a Protestant country and by aligning the struggle for Puerto Rico’s independence with Catholicism he was strengthening the distinction between the two cultures. James Connolly stressed the Catholicism of the Irish as a means of creating a clear cultural separation from the Protestant British. Albizu did the same. He stressed the Catholicism of Puerto Rico and the Protestantism of the US as a way of contrasting values. Values that the US was trying to eradicate in Puerto Rico.

In 1921 Albizu returned to Puerto Rico without his law degree due to a racist professor at Harvard who kept him from taking his final exams. In 1922 he married Laura Meneses, a Peruvian woman he’d met at Harvard. He then took and passed his final exams in Puerto Rico, finally earning his law degree from Harvard. At 30 years old Albizu had a Bachelor of Philosophy, a Masters in Industrial Chemistry and Civil Engineering from the University Of Vermont, a Doctorate Of Philosophy and Letters and a Doctorate of Laws from Harvard. He turned down many lucrative job offers to return to Puerto Rico and settled into a poor barrio in his home town Ponce known as La Cantera and began practicing law.

In 1924 he joined the Nationalist Party, a political party that advocated for the independence of Puerto Rico, and was voted vice president of the party. He traveled around Latin America garnering support for Puerto Rican independence. He went to Haiti where his interview with Haitian nationalists Pierre Paulie and Jolibois Fils became a part of Haitian history. He was well-known in the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua and Haiti for speaking out against US imperialism in El Nacionalista de Puerto Rico, the Puerto Rican Nationalist newspaper. Besides Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Nicaragua, Albizu traveled to Cuba, Mexico, Pananma, Peru and Venezuela. Albizu was a powerful orator and had a mind sharpened by his studies in philosophy and law. Albizu was placing the independence of Puerto Rico as continuity of the larger Latin American struggle with imperialism in the same way that James Connolly did placing the Irish independence movement within an internationalist framework.

In 1933 Albizu became heavily involved in labor issues in Puerto Rico. He led an island wide general strike against the Puerto Rico Railway Light And Power Company that paralyzed the island. The general strike launched Albizu onto a national stage in Puerto Rico. In 1934 sugar cane workers called for another general strike and came to Albizu to lead them in the strike. Albizu supported the sugar cane workers but declined a leadership role in the workers unions saying that they should be led by workers. The sugar cane workers strike was a huge success and it galvanized support for Albizu and the Nationalist Party in Puerto Rico.

James Connolly who was also a great defender of the working class organized strikes in Ireland and used those strikes to foster Irish Republicanism. The tactic worked for Connolly in Ireland and it worked for Albizu in Puerto Rico. As the labor movements were guided by these men into nationalist movements both men planned insurrections against their oppressors that would eventually take their lives. For Connolly it was the Easter Rising of 1916. For Albizu it was the Nationalist Insurrection of Jayuya in 1950 and the assassination attempt by Nationalists on President Truman.

Albizu and the Nationalists staged an insurrection in October of 1950 in the small mountain town of Jayuya. The rebellion failed but Albizu’s goal was not so much to take over the country in open warfare but to bring the world’s attention to the plight of US imperialism in Puerto Rico. In effect Albizu was trying to bring global attention to the hypocrisy of the US, as it fought wars for freedom it in other nations and at the same time denied the freedom of another nation. In November of 1950 an assassination attempt on President Truman by Oscar Collazo and Grisello Torresola put Albizu back in prison. Albizu had already served 10 years in prison already for seditious conspiracy to overthrow the US government and for the second time in his life he found that the fight for freedom, led him to a prison sentence of 80 years.

Albizu would be tortured in prison with radiation experiments and when his health deteriorated to certain death he was pardoned by Puerto Rican governor Luis Muñoz Marin in Novemeber of 1964. A few moths later in 1965 Albizu died. It was a prolonged agonizing end to a man who would not compromise his ideals in the face of death. Like James Connolly who was so badly wounded in the Easter Rising that he needed to be carried to the firing squad on a stretcher and tied to a chair to be shot because he could not stand, Albizu had given his life over to the struggle for freedom. The philosophy and example that James Connolly and Don Pedro Albizu Campos left behind for the rest of us struggling for freedom can best be summed up by Albizu…

“Courage is the only thing which permits a man to pass firmly and serenely over the shadows of death and when man passes serenely over the shadows of death, he enters into immortality.”


Check out the 6X international award winning film MACHETERO on Vimeo On Demand. The film is a meditation on the violent struggle for Puerto Rican independence but it’s also a film that speaks to larger issues of colonized peoples around the world.


33 thoughts on “Don Pedro Albizu Campos And James Connolly: Brothers In Arms”

  1. That said, Pedro Albizu Campos sounds like a great revolutionary thinker, but I wonder, if he would come to the realization later, that it wasn’ “protestantism” that fueled American Imperalism, but greed and CAPITALISM.

    1. i think Albizu was looking for something to unite Puerto Ricans against US imperialism and it’s true that the real battle was with capitalism and not protestantism… But at that time most of Puerto Rico was Catholic due to Spain’s imperialist adventure of 400 years… And so i think as a tactic Albizu emphasized the Catholicism as means of unity…

      Albizu was not a very good Catholic by most accounts and i think he saw Catholicism as a means to an end… i don’t think he held any ill will toward Protestants in any way…

      As for your analysis in your previous comment on Catholicism’s role in Irish Republicanism i will concede to your knowledge on those issues… A lot of what i wrote here is based on a friend of a friends dissertation on Albizu, Catholicism and Irish Republicanism… And what little i could find about Albizu’s life at that time…

      That being said… there is a new well researched book out now called WAR AGAINST PUERTO RICANS by Nelson Denis that might illuminate this period of Albizu’s relationship with Irish Republicanism… (i only just started reading it and highly recommend it)…

      My thanks to you on your insight… If there is anything specific that you think should be changed in the post i’d be happy to revise it…

      1. Thanks Vagabond, you’re a gentleman and a scholar. Good article too I must add, the only thing I would change is the part about Home Rule I’d mentioned. The Republican Movement fought for National Sovereignty, never the British Occupation approved “Home Rule” program pushed by John Redmond & his Irish Parliamentary Party , who persuaded Irishmen to fight and die in no small number, in the gas blasted trenches of W.W.I. for the blood thirsty, genocidal and racist British Empire, rather than they fight for total freedom in their own country, and drive the British from their land. Everything the I.R.A. fought for, is enshrined in the Easter Proclamation of the Irish Republic signed by unparalleled heroes and martyrs like Thomas Clarke, Seán Mac Diarmada, Thomas MacDonagh, Padraig Pearse, Éamonn Ceannt, James Connolly, and Joseph Plunkett, a sacred document to Irish Republicans, which promises equal rights to all people of Ireland, irrespective of religious creed or affiliation. Even though these principles have never been applied to the people of Ireland, by the governments in the north and the south, they remain the unchanging principles of freedom that so many Irishmen and Irishwomen have sacrificed their freedom and lives to attain. I pray that one day they will be implemented in full.

        i Dlúthpháirtíocht, Rory Dubhdara, Radio Rebel Gael

      2. Let me make some changes… check back in a day or so… Let me know what you think… i’m always open to being informed by those who know better… As Mark Twain once said… “Never let your schooling interfere with your education…”

    2. He saw protestantism as an Americanizing force when the americans got here land was partitioned to protestant churches for that purpose.

  2. I think Albizu was on the right path and understood how dangerous, racists and vile, American Imperialism, really is, but I think you’re misunderstanding the Irish Republican movement and James Connolly, (who was an agnostic, and not a practitioner of Catholicism) who like the founder of Irish Republicanism, Wolfe Tone ( A PROTESTANT) was not fighting for a Catholic or Protestant Religious State, but a Republic where Irish people, irrespective of religious faith, were equal citizens, and especially, with James Connolly, and those who followed in his foot steps , a 32 COUNTY SOCIALIST REPUBLIC. This part of your article is totally contradictory :

    “Albizu was introduced to the struggle for Irish Republicanism through two Catholic priests. Father Rodes introduced him to the Catalan Philosopher Priest Jaime Balmes who believed that where Catholicism brought order to Europe, Protestantism was rebellious and brought revolt to Europe.” Fenians, Irish Republicans, were by nature REBELS, some of them Protestant, some of them Catholic, some Atheist, but the very idea that any Fenian would think, ever, that REVOLT or REBELLION was “bad” is totally false. Through out the history of the Republican Struggle in Ireland, time and time again, the Catholic Church, more often than not, were the enemies of the National Liberation struggle,. and rarely the allies or comrades of Irish Sovereignty. To quote Wolfe Tone, regarding faith and republicanism :
    “To subvert the tyranny of our execrable government, to break the connection with England, the never-failing source of all our political evils, and to assert the independence of my country, these were my objects. To unite the whole people of Ireland, to abolish the memory of past dissensions, and to substitute the common name of Irishman, in place of the denominations of Protestant, Catholic and Dissenter, these were my means.”

    and James Connolly took the question of faith even further, when he reminded his comrades that :

    “The day has passed for patching up the capitalist system; it must go. And in the work of abolishing it the Catholic and the Protestant, the Catholic and the Jew, the Catholic and the Freethinker, the Catholic and the Buddhist, the Catholic and the Mahometan will co-operate together, knowing no rivalry but the rivalry of endeavour toward an end beneficial to all. For, as we have said elsewhere, socialism is neither Protestant nor Catholic, Christian nor Freethinker, Buddhist, Mahometan, nor Jew; it is only Human. We of the socialist working class realise that as we suffer together we must work together that we may enjoy together. We reject the firebrand of capitalist warfare and offer you the olive leaf of brotherhood and justice to and for all.” “Labour, Nationality and Religion: The Firebrand or the Oive Leaf”

    Also, no Fenian ever supported, believed in nor fought for “Home Rule”, they were, like their Loyalist foes, against “Home Rule”, but for different reasons. Mainly they wanted ENTIRE FREEDOM FROM BRITAIN , National Sovereignty, for Ireland, not any “home rule” where the people of Ireland would still be part of a vassal state. And it was Michael Collins, not De Valera that brokered the notorious “Anglo-Irish Treaty” of 1921, which, in fact, turned out to be , much worse than “Home Rule”.

  3. I was wondering, in the essay above, why is Lolita Lebrón mention as one of the below? It presently reads “In November of 1950 an assassination attempt on President Truman by Oscar Collazo and Grisello Torresola put Albizu back in prison.”

    1. Albizu was thrown back in prison in 1950 because of El Grito De Jayuya and the Truman assassination attempt at Blair House in DC… Lolita wasn’t the reason he was sent to prison… Lolita’s attack on the US Congress wasn’t until 1954 and Albizu was already in prison… Lolita claimed that Albizu asked her to do the attack on the US Congress from prison…

      1. …and of course Lolita along with Rafael Cancel Miranda, Irving Flores Rodriguez and Andres Figueroa Cordero. Then someone hardly ever mentioned, Don Julio Pinto Gandia being the brain and main organizer behind the whole operation.

  4. This is the greatest post related to outstanding personalities, taking significants roles and contributions to political process throughout the world.
    I have to make an special distinction to Don Pedro Albisu Campos, our greatest figure who puts away he’s personal interests to fight for the independence of the Island of Puerto Rico 🇵🇷. Dispit the atrocities he had to deal with on his way, he never surrendered.

  5. This is the greatest post related to outstanding personalities, taking significants roles and contributions to political process throughout the world.
    I have to make an special distinction to Don Pedro Albisu Campos, our greatest figure who puts away he’s personal interests to fight for the independence of the Island of Puerto Rico 🇵🇷. Dispit the atrocities he had to deal with on his way, he never surrendered.

  6. I hate racism amongst many things, but racism is plain empty, there’s absolutely nothing in it, plain ignorance and hate. Albizu obviously of European descent mixed with African and for that this genius received the inhumane treatment that no one deserves.

  7. While I am a proud American, I cannot deny that history is written gy the winners. I cannot help think, what if Albizu would have been a proud American instead. His skills and achievements, his education – when you compare them to many of our own American heroes, wouldn’t he this guy almost overshadow our own?

    1. Hi there Native. While I basically understand what you are trying to say, which I do appreciate and agree with very much, one sentence prevents me from totally grasping the whole statement and I quote:

      “I cannot help think, what if Albizu (would have been) a proud American instead”. End of quote.

      Albizu was a proud American indeed. Not because of the present relationship between PR and the USA but because PR is part of the American continent, not just the USA as some mistakenly believe; ignoring the remaining 34 or so countries that actually make up what America really is, with a millenary history and culture (with all of its contradictions included) that surpasses by far, that of the USA, born as such in 1776.
      In fact, PR is not even part of the USA; never has been. It belongs to but is not part of and it won’t be until we are officially declared a state which I doubt very much it will ever happen.

      Moreover, while the majority refer to the events of October 12th, 1492 as “the discovery of America” by Christopher Columbus, as if doing the inhabitants of this part of the planet a favor, Albizu refers to the so called “discovery” as an encounter between two worlds that didn’t know the other one existed, therefore eliminating that label of inferiority usually attached to the so called “New World” by Europeans and some Americans as well.

      And so when he spoke of America or the American people he understood quite clearly that America wasn’t just the USA as some mistakenly believe but a whole Continent divided in basically three sections, North, Central (including the Caribbean) and South America; all of its citizens, Americans.

  8. Hi, nice article! Very interesting the relation between Albizu and Valera. Do you have the document (archive, link)of that? Thanks!

  9. Israel..the same question I have..I am considering writing a love story within the bigger story. Laura and Pedro’s relationship, where they came from, how they met and the family they created. Pedro’s meeting with Eamon De Valera may have included Laura however finding detail information about the event is hard to find. One interesting reference is a book that was supposed to be written in 2010 by Rivera Serrano and published by Ausubo Press. If you check the website of Ausubo Press, it states as of today (may 2021) that the book is temporarily on hold because their is no demand. This doesn’t seem to make sense. If you find something can you pass it along.

If you saw something, say something...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s